Am 19.04.2017 um 21:14 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On 20 April 2017 at 04:42, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked
On 20 April 2017 at 04:42, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>>
>>> Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
>>> around a sem_file to see how
On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote:
> Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>
>> Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
>> around a sem_file to see how they might look.
>>
>> This means the drm_syncobj are currently only
On 04/19/2017 05:07 AM, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
around a sem_file to see how they might look.
This means the drm_syncobj are currently only useful for semaphores,
the flags field could
Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
around a sem_file to see how they might look.
This means the drm_syncobj are currently only useful for semaphores,
the flags field could be used in future to use it for other things,
and