Re: [rfc repost] drm sync objects - a new beginning (make ickle happier?)

2017-04-20 Thread Christian König
Am 19.04.2017 um 21:14 schrieb Dave Airlie: On 20 April 2017 at 04:42, Dave Airlie wrote: On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote: Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie: Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked

Re: [rfc repost] drm sync objects - a new beginning (make ickle happier?)

2017-04-19 Thread Dave Airlie
On 20 April 2017 at 04:42, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote: >> Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie: >>> >>> Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things >>> around a sem_file to see how

Re: [rfc repost] drm sync objects - a new beginning (make ickle happier?)

2017-04-19 Thread Dave Airlie
On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote: > Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie: >> >> Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things >> around a sem_file to see how they might look. >> >> This means the drm_syncobj are currently only

Re: [rfc repost] drm sync objects - a new beginning (make ickle happier?)

2017-04-19 Thread James Jones
On 04/19/2017 05:07 AM, Christian König wrote: Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie: Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things around a sem_file to see how they might look. This means the drm_syncobj are currently only useful for semaphores, the flags field could

Re: [rfc repost] drm sync objects - a new beginning (make ickle happier?)

2017-04-19 Thread Christian König
Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie: Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things around a sem_file to see how they might look. This means the drm_syncobj are currently only useful for semaphores, the flags field could be used in future to use it for other things, and