Re: Preparation for unpinned DMA-buf handling

2019-05-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:24 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:52 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:08 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:54 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:13PM +0200,

Re: Preparation for unpinned DMA-buf handling

2019-05-15 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:52 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:08 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:54 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > > > > > since we are

Re: Preparation for unpinned DMA-buf handling

2019-05-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:08 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:54 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > > > since we are not moving forward with this I've separated the change out > > > of

Re: Preparation for unpinned DMA-buf handling

2019-05-15 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:54 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > since we are not moving forward with this I've separated the change out of > > the larger patchset. > > > > Any objections to this now? It's basically

Re: Preparation for unpinned DMA-buf handling

2019-05-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > since we are not moving forward with this I've separated the change out of > the larger patchset. > > Any objections to this now? It's basically a 1:1 move of the functionality > from DRM to DMA-buf. For my big