On 25/09/2019 15:12, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 25.09.19 um 16:06 schrieb Steven Price:
>> On 24/09/2019 10:55, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>>> Sorry for the delayed response, have been busy on other stuff last week.
>>>
>>> Am 17.09.19 um 14:46 schrieb Steven Price:
On 17/09/2019 09:42,
Am 25.09.19 um 16:06 schrieb Steven Price:
> On 24/09/2019 10:55, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Sorry for the delayed response, have been busy on other stuff last week.
>>
>> Am 17.09.19 um 14:46 schrieb Steven Price:
>>> On 17/09/2019 09:42, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Hi Steven,
On 24/09/2019 10:55, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response, have been busy on other stuff last week.
>
> Am 17.09.19 um 14:46 schrieb Steven Price:
>> On 17/09/2019 09:42, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>>> Hi Steven,
>>>
>>> thought about that issue a bit more and I think I came up
Sorry for the delayed response, have been busy on other stuff last week.
Am 17.09.19 um 14:46 schrieb Steven Price:
> On 17/09/2019 09:42, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> thought about that issue a bit more and I think I came up with a
>> solution.
>>
>> What you could do is to
On 17/09/2019 09:42, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Hi Steven,
thought about that issue a bit more and I think I came up with a solution.
What you could do is to split up drm_sched_cleanup_jobs() into two
functions.
One that checks if jobs to be cleaned up are present and one which does
the actual
Hi Steven,
thought about that issue a bit more and I think I came up with a solution.
What you could do is to split up drm_sched_cleanup_jobs() into two
functions.
One that checks if jobs to be cleaned up are present and one which does
the actual cleanup.
This way we could call
Am 16.09.19 um 16:24 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:11 AM Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> the problem seems to be than panfrost is trying to sleep while freeing a
>> job. E.g. it tries to take a mutex.
>>
>> That is not allowed any more since we need to free
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:11 AM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> the problem seems to be than panfrost is trying to sleep while freeing a
> job. E.g. it tries to take a mutex.
>
> That is not allowed any more since we need to free the jobs from atomic
> and even interrupt context.
>
>
Hi Steven,
the problem seems to be than panfrost is trying to sleep while freeing a
job. E.g. it tries to take a mutex.
That is not allowed any more since we need to free the jobs from atomic
and even interrupt context.
Your suggestion wouldn't work because this way jobs are not freed when
