On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:56:10AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, Thomas Shao wrote:
In current hyper-v time sync service,it only gets the initial clock time
from the host. It didn't process the following time samples. This change
introduced a module parameter called
Hi Guennadi,
Am Samstag, den 20.09.2014, 09:24 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
Hi Philippe,
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
In preparation for a following patch, stop decrementing the endpoint node
refcount in the loop. This temporarily leaks a reference to the endpoint
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:26:47AM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
Hi,
2014-09-24 18:45 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:22:36AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
static void dgap_release_remap(struct board_t *brd)
{
-
I only had read the first patch when I wrote this email. Some of these
patches are ok as-is but it's complicated to cherry pick patches from
the middle of a series.
regards,
dan carpenter
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
2014-09-25 16:50 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:26:47AM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
Hi,
2014-09-24 18:45 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:22:36AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
static void
-Original Message-
From: Sitsofe Wheeler [mailto:sits...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 2:08 PM
To: Olaf Hering
Cc: Thomas Shao; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org;
a...@canonical.com;
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 00:02 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:12:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Gar. I hate to make you redo a lot of work but these need to be broken
up into one thing per patch. That rules is kind of vague so we
normally tell people to fix one type of
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:40:42AM +, Thomas Shao wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, Thomas Shao wrote:
with the host clock using host time sample. By default it is
disabled, because we still recommend user to configure NTP for time
-Original Message-
From: Sitsofe Wheeler
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 08:22:15AM -0500, Romer, Benjamin M wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 00:02 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:12:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Gar. I hate to make you redo a lot of work but these need to be broken
up into one thing per patch. That
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 16:30 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Probably that's fine, but normally we suggest:
patch 1: clean up long lines
patch 2: delete extra blank lines
patch 3: comments
or whatever...
OK, thanks. I suppose if I'm not sure, I'll make individual patches and
I can just
So can anywayone give me a review for those two patches?
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 08:09:14PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
This patch-set addresses issues with LUN hot-add and remove. When the host
notifies the guest that a scan is needed, scan the host. Also, prior to
discovering new
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 19:34 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:56:19AM -0400, Benjamin Romer wrote:
+struct periodic_work *
+ visor_periodic_work_create(ulong jiffy_interval,
+ struct workqueue_struct *workqueue,
+
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:53:53AM -0500, Romer, Benjamin M wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 19:34 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:56:19AM -0400, Benjamin Romer wrote:
+struct periodic_work *
+ visor_periodic_work_create(ulong jiffy_interval,
+
Signed-off-by: Mike Roocroft mike.li...@btinternet.com
---
drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c
b/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c
index a76db3f..863d4b1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c
+++
Signed-off-by: Mike Roocroft mike.li...@btinternet.com
---
drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c
b/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c
index a76db3f..863d4b1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c
+++
If a partition appears mounted more than once in /proc/mounts, vss_do_freeze()
succeeds only for the first time and gets EBUSY (on freeze) or EINVAL (on
thaw) for the second time. The patch ignores these to make the backup feature
work.
Also improved the error handling in case a freeze operation
16 matches
Mail list logo
