Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 41/80] staging: lustre: lmv: separate master object with master stripe

> On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:10 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote: > >>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote: >> >> my that’s an old patch >> >>> > ... >>> >>> Whoever

Re: [PATCH 41/80] staging: lustre: lmv: separate master object with master stripe

On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote: >> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote: > > my that’s an old patch > >> ... >> >> Whoever converted it to "!strcmp()" inverted the condition. This is a >> perfect example of why I

Re: [PATCH 41/80] staging: lustre: lmv: separate master object with master stripe

> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote: my that’s an old patch > >> >> +static inline bool >> +lsm_md_eq(const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm1, const struct lmv_stripe_md >> *lsm2) >> +{ >> +int idx; >> + >> +if

Re: [PATCH 41/80] staging: lustre: lmv: separate master object with master stripe

On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote: > > +static inline bool > +lsm_md_eq(const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm1, const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm2) > +{ > + int idx; > + > + if (lsm1->lsm_md_magic != lsm2->lsm_md_magic || > + lsm1->lsm_md_stripe_count != lsm2->lsm_md_stripe_count

[PATCH] scsi: storvsc: missing error code in storvsc_probe()

From: Long Li This patch backports upstream commit ca8dc694045e9aa248e9916e0f614deb0494cb3d for 4.14-stable. commit ca8dc694045e9aa248e9916e0f614deb0494cb3d: We should set the error code if fc_remote_port_add() fails. Cc: #v4.12+ Fixes:

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: Add mmc_force_detect_change_begin / _end functions

On 8 February 2018 at 15:59, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:43:49PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 30 August 2017 at 14:44, Hans de Goede wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > On 21-07-17 16:35, Quentin Schulz wrote: >>

[PATCH] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Defer probing if no MC portal available

MC portals may not be available at the initial probing attempt due to dependencies on other modules. Check the return value of the MC portal allocation function and defer probing in case it's not available yet. For all other error cases the behaviour stays the same. Signed-off-by: Ioana

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: Add mmc_force_detect_change_begin / _end functions

Hi Ulf, On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:43:49PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 30 August 2017 at 14:44, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > On 21-07-17 16:35, Quentin Schulz wrote: > >> > >> From: Hans de Goede > >> > >> Some sdio devices have a