or more information on Raspberry Pi's PoE hat see:
> + * https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/poe-hat/
Out of personal interest: Is this hat also able to power a RPi CM4?
> + * Limitations:
> + * - No disable bit, so a disabled PWM is simulated by duty_cycle 0
> + * - Only normal po
Hello Nicolas,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:01:00PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 12:50 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 01:32:44PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > + /*
> > > +
r the next reboot, right? If so I wonder if it
is a good idea in general. (Think: The current PWM setting enables a
motor that makes a self-driving car move at 100 km/h. Consider the rpi
crashes, do I want to car to pick up driving 100 km/h at power up even
before Linux is up again?) And if we a
in .remove().
Also fix the bus remove function to always return 0.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_user.c | 4 +---
drivers/vme/vme.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/vme.h| 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions
;
> + rpipwm->chip.dev = dev;
> + rpipwm->chip.ops = _pwm_ops;
> + rpipwm->chip.base = -1;
> + rpipwm->chip.npwm = RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE_PWM_NUM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpipwm);
> +
> + ret = raspberrypi_pwm_get_property(rpipwm->firmware,
> RP
drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c uses the old style PWM callbacks, new drivers
should stick to the atomic API instead.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
On 12/8/20 10:39 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> No sign off?
>
> Please also add a staging prefix since this part of greybus st
drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c uses the old style PWM callbacks, new drivers
should stick to the atomic API instead.
---
drivers/staging/greybus/TODO | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/TODO b/drivers/staging/greybus/TODO
index 31f1f2cb401c..6461e0132fe3
regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org
this patch?
I understand it as: Please squash this hunk changing the #include into
patch 3. But note that I don't know anything about the stuff Philipp is
working on.
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions | http
