On Tue, Mar 13 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> One of Neil's recent cleanups apparently has led the code to get
> to a state where gcc tracks the 'seqnr' variable just enough to
> see that it is sometimes initialized in seq_client_alloc_seq(),
> but not enough that it can prove this initialization
One of Neil's recent cleanups apparently has led the code to get
to a state where gcc tracks the 'seqnr' variable just enough to
see that it is sometimes initialized in seq_client_alloc_seq(),
but not enough that it can prove this initialization to be reliable
before the use of that variable:
