> On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> These are looking good to me.
>
> Can I get an "Acked-by:" or something so that I know it's ok to apply
> these?
>
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:39:22AM -0400, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote:
>
> > On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> >> Hi Dmitry,
> >>
> >> These are looking good to me.
> >
> > Can
> On 16 Sep 2015, at 11:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:39:22AM -0400, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote:
>>
>>> On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:31:47PM
> On 16 Sep 2015, at 11:55, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote:
>
>
>> On 16 Sep 2015, at 11:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:39:22AM -0400, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote:
>>>
On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:12, Greg
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
These are looking good to me.
Can I get an Acked-by: or something so that I know it's ok to apply
these?
thanks,
greg k-h-
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
Hi Dmitry,
These are looking good to me.
You mention error handling in relation to vme_master_mmap, am I right in
thinking patch 3 avoids errors being recorded when triggered by an mmap
access (so as not to appear as a spurious error on a later access)?
I think it would be worth at least