Re: [PATCH 0/3] VME bus error handling overhaul

2015-09-16 Thread Dmitry Kalinkin
> On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote: >> Hi Dmitry, >> >> These are looking good to me. > > Can I get an "Acked-by:" or something so that I know it's ok to apply > these? > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] VME bus error handling overhaul

2015-09-16 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:39:22AM -0400, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote: > > > On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote: > >> Hi Dmitry, > >> > >> These are looking good to me. > > > > Can

Re: [PATCH 0/3] VME bus error handling overhaul

2015-09-16 Thread Dmitry Kalinkin
> On 16 Sep 2015, at 11:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:39:22AM -0400, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote: >> >>> On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:31:47PM

Re: [PATCH 0/3] VME bus error handling overhaul

2015-09-16 Thread Dmitry Kalinkin
> On 16 Sep 2015, at 11:55, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote: > > >> On 16 Sep 2015, at 11:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:39:22AM -0400, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote: >>> On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:12, Greg

Re: [PATCH 0/3] VME bus error handling overhaul

2015-08-05 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote: Hi Dmitry, These are looking good to me. Can I get an Acked-by: or something so that I know it's ok to apply these? thanks, greg k-h- ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org

Re: [PATCH 0/3] VME bus error handling overhaul

2015-07-06 Thread Martyn Welch
Hi Dmitry, These are looking good to me. You mention error handling in relation to vme_master_mmap, am I right in thinking patch 3 avoids errors being recorded when triggered by an mmap access (so as not to appear as a spurious error on a later access)? I think it would be worth at least