Re: [PATCH 16/34] drivers/tee: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

2019-08-02 Thread John Hubbard
On 8/1/19 11:29 PM, Jens Wiklander wrote: On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:20 AM wrote: From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide

Re: [PATCH 16/34] drivers/tee: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

2019-08-02 Thread Jens Wiklander
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:20 AM wrote: > > From: John Hubbard > > For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages > via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or > release_pages(). > > This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit

[PATCH 16/34] drivers/tee: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

2019-08-01 Thread john . hubbard
From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder