Yes yes. I wasn't commenting on the patch, which seems fine.
regards,
dan carpenter
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 01:00:47PM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:00:28 +0300
> Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:22:50 +0300
> > > Dan Carpenter
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:00:28 +0300
Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:22:50 +0300
> > Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:44:20PM +0200,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:22:50 +0300
> Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:44:20PM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> > > From: Andrey Shvetsov
> > >
> > > This
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:22:50 +0300
Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:44:20PM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> > From: Andrey Shvetsov
> >
> > This patch puts the synchronization procedure trigger for asynchronous
> > channels
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:44:20PM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> From: Andrey Shvetsov
>
> This patch puts the synchronization procedure trigger for asynchronous
> channels into the function hdm_configure_channel. Likewise, it removes
> triggering of hardware specific
From: Andrey Shvetsov
This patch puts the synchronization procedure trigger for asynchronous
channels into the function hdm_configure_channel. Likewise, it removes
triggering of hardware specific synchronization for other channel types
from the probe function as it is not