On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:46:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 02:04:21PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > The success path and the error path both are first doing
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore()
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 02:04:21PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > The success path and the error path both are first doing
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore() before returning. Use that in the common path
> > and return the
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> The success path and the error path both are first doing
> spin_unlock_irqrestore() before returning. Use that in the common path
> and return the success/error value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
>
The success path and the error path both are first doing
spin_unlock_irqrestore() before returning. Use that in the common path
and return the success/error value.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
---
v2: changed label name
It is dependent on the patch series sent by