Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] A trio of vchiq bulk transfer fixes

2021-01-11 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 16:20 +, Phil Elwell wrote: > The recent batch of vchiq improvements broke bulk transfers in two ways: > > 1. The userdata associated with a transfer was lost in the case that a >    non-blocking mode was used. > > 2. The 64-bit ioctl compatibility shim for a bulk

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] A trio of vchiq bulk transfer fixes

2021-01-05 Thread Dan Carpenter
Thanks! Acked-by: Dan Carpenter regards, dan carpenter ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

[PATCH v2 0/3] A trio of vchiq bulk transfer fixes

2021-01-05 Thread Phil Elwell
The recent batch of vchiq improvements broke bulk transfers in two ways: 1. The userdata associated with a transfer was lost in the case that a non-blocking mode was used. 2. The 64-bit ioctl compatibility shim for a bulk transfer used the wrong ioctl command. This patch set fixes both of