Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: replace uintXX_t to uXX and intXX_t to sXX

2019-11-11 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 05:04:49PM +, Jerome Pouiller wrote: > I know that uXX is prefered over uintXX_t. However, I dislike to change > 650 lines of code only for this purpose in one batch. It will generate > plenty of conflicts with branches currently in development. Now that the code is

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: replace uintXX_t to uXX and intXX_t to sXX

2019-11-11 Thread Jerome Pouiller
On Monday 11 November 2019 14:30:53 CET Jules Irenge wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Replace uint8_t to u8, uint16_t to u16, uint32_t to u32 > int

[PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: replace uintXX_t to uXX and intXX_t to sXX

2019-11-11 Thread Jules Irenge
Replace uint8_t to u8, uint16_t to u16, uint32_t to u32 int8_t to s8,int16_t to s16 and int32_t to s32 As per recommendation of checkpatch tool. Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge --- Changes v1 had a spacing error v2 fixes the error and includes all the changes related to this patch in the driver. dr