On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov
>> wrote:
>>> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>>>
Also, can you share the
Andy Lutomirski writes:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Also, can you share the benchmark you used for these patches?
>>
>> I didn't do much while writing the patchset,
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>
>>
>> Also, can you share the benchmark you used for these patches?
>
> I didn't do much while writing the patchset, mostly I was running the
> attached dumb trasher (32
.@linuxdriverproject.org; Thomas Gleixner
> <t...@linutronix.de>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remote TLB
> flush
>
> Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov
> <vkuzn.
Andy Lutomirski writes:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>>
>>> On 05/19/2017 07:09 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>
>> On 05/19/2017 07:09 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB flush,
>>> this is supposed to work faster than
g; Thomas Gleixner
> <t...@linutronix.de>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remote TLB
> flush
>
> Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On 05/19/2017 07:09 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> Hy
Andy Lutomirski writes:
> On 05/19/2017 07:09 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB flush,
>> this is supposed to work faster than IPIs.
>>
>> Implementation details: to do HvFlushVirtualAddress{Space,List} hypercalls
>>
On 05/19/2017 07:09 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB flush,
this is supposed to work faster than IPIs.
Implementation details: to do HvFlushVirtualAddress{Space,List} hypercalls
we need to put the input somewhere in memory and we
Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB flush,
this is supposed to work faster than IPIs.
Implementation details: to do HvFlushVirtualAddress{Space,List} hypercalls
we need to put the input somewhere in memory and we don't really want to
have memory allocation on each
10 matches
Mail list logo