On 04/17 :41, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 4/16/19 5:13 PM, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
> > Fix a blank line after structure declarations. Also, convert
> > macros into inline functions in order to maintain Linux kernel
> > coding style based on which the inline function is
> > preferable over the macr
On 4/16/19 5:13 PM, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
> Fix a blank line after structure declarations. Also, convert
> macros into inline functions in order to maintain Linux kernel
> coding style based on which the inline function is
> preferable over the macro.
Madhumitha, here is my explanation for
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 06:19:50AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> I'm not completely sure about the inline function, but on the no blank
> lines thing (and many other minor issues) "checkpatch.pl" is to blame.
> There are lots of examples of issues that checkpatch points out that are
> matters of opin
On 4/17/19 1:25 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 05:13:18PM -0500, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
>> Fix a blank line after structure declarations. Also, convert
>> macros into inline functions in order to maintain Linux kernel
>> coding style based on which the inline function is
>> pref
On 16-04-19, 17:13, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
> Fix a blank line after structure declarations. Also, convert
> macros into inline functions in order to maintain Linux kernel
> coding style based on which the inline function is
> preferable over the macro.
>
> Blank line fixes are suggested by c