Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Follow up on Ion from LPC

2016-11-29 Thread Laura Abbott
On 11/25/2016 04:30 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > Hi Laura, > > Thanks for what you are doing on ION. > As soon that will be ok I will submit again the driver for sti platform. > > After reading your mail I have the feeling that solves cache, > devicetree and legacy support problems will be

Re: Follow up on Ion from LPC

2016-11-25 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:07:51PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > I'd like to keep using linaro-mm-sig as a mailing list for Ion > discussion as well as drivers-devel. You could add it to MAINTAINERS so people thinking about ION know it exists. regards, dan carpenter

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Follow up on Ion from LPC

2016-11-25 Thread Benjamin Gaignard
Hi Laura, Thanks for what you are doing on ION. As soon that will be ok I will submit again the driver for sti platform. After reading your mail I have the feeling that solves cache, devicetree and legacy support problems will be difficult. Since "Unix Device Memory Allocator" claims that it

Follow up on Ion from LPC

2016-11-18 Thread Laura Abbott
Hi, At LPC, I proposed a moratorium on new Ion features because of issues preventing Ion ever moving out of staging. Among other problems, the Ion caching model hasn't made much progress to a solution that is widely accepted and there are still problems with devicetree support. There were no