> -Original Message-
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that the wreckage is in Linus tree and needs to be fixed
> > > > there, i.e. via x86/urgent.
> > > >
> > > > Now we have the new bits queued in
inux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de;
> > a...@canonical.com;
> > jasow...@redhat.com; h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger
> > ;
> > Michael Kelley (EOSG) ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular
.@canonical.com;
> jasow...@redhat.com; h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger
> ;
> Michael Kelley (EOSG) ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependency in IPI
> enlightenment.
>
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > >
> > > The problem is that the wreckage is in Linus tree and needs to be fixed
> > > there, i.e. via x86/urgent.
> > >
> > > Now we have the new bits queued in x86/hyperv already which collide. So
> > > we
* Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > I am confused. The label ipi_mask_done was introduced in this patch
> > > (the patch under question fixes a circular dependency in this patch):
> > >
> > > commit
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that the wreckage is in Linus tree and needs to be fixed
> > there, i.e. via x86/urgent.
> >
> > Now we have the new bits queued in x86/hyperv already which collide. So
> > we
> > need to merge x86/urgent into x86/hyperv after
anonical.com;
> jasow...@redhat.com; h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger
> ; Michael Kelley (EOSG)
> ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependency in IPI
> enlightenment.
>
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * KY Srinivasan wro
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > I am confused. The label ipi_mask_done was introduced in this patch
> > (the patch under question fixes a circular dependency in this patch):
> >
> > commit 68bb7bfb7985df2bd15c2dc975cb68b7a901488a
> > Author: K. Y. Srinivasan
ernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de;
> > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de;
> > h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger ; Michael
> > Kelley (EOSG) ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular depende
@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de;
> h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger ; Michael
> Kelley (EOSG) ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependency in IPI
> enlightenment.
>
>
> * KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
> &
ernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de;
> > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de;
> > h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger ; Michael
> > Kelley (EOSG) ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependenc
@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de;
> h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger ; Michael
> Kelley (EOSG) ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependency in IPI
> enlightenment.
>
>
> * k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
>
* k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: "K. Y. Srinivasan"
>
> The IPI hypercalls depend on being able to map the Linux notion of CPU ID
> to the hypervisor's notion of the CPU ID. The array hv_vp_index[] provides
> this mapping. Code for populating this array depends on the IPI
k...@linuxonhyperv.com writes:
> From: "K. Y. Srinivasan"
>
> The IPI hypercalls depend on being able to map the Linux notion of CPU ID
> to the hypervisor's notion of the CPU ID. The array hv_vp_index[] provides
> this mapping. Code for populating this array depends on the IPI functionality.
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
