On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 7:32 PM Dexuan Cui wrote:
>
> > From: Dan Williams
> > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 5:29 PM
> > ...
> > Honestly, the quickest path to something functional for Linux is to
> > simply delete the _LSR support and use raw mode defined namespaces.
> > Why have labels if they
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:17 PM Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > From: Dan Williams
[..]
> > Honestly, the quickest path to something functional for Linux is to
> > simply delete the _LSR support and use raw mode defined namespaces.
> > Why have labels if they are read-only and the region is sufficient for
> From: Dan Williams
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 5:29 PM
> ...
> Honestly, the quickest path to something functional for Linux is to
> simply delete the _LSR support and use raw mode defined namespaces.
> Why have labels if they are read-only and the region is sufficient for
> defining
> From: Dan Williams
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 5:29 PM
> > ...
> > The "size" and "mode" still don't look right, but the improvement is that
> > now I can see a good descriptive "name", which I suppose is retrieved
> > from Hyper-V.
>
> Mode is right, there is no way for Hyper-V to create
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 5:06 PM Dexuan Cui wrote:
>
> > From: Linux-nvdimm On Behalf Of
> > Dexuan Cui
> > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 4:34 PM
> > > > > ...
> > > > > Those reads find a namespace index block
> > > > > and a label. Unfortunately the label has the LOCAL flag set and Linux
> > >
> From: Linux-nvdimm On Behalf Of
> Dexuan Cui
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 4:34 PM
> > > > ...
> > > > Those reads find a namespace index block
> > > > and a label. Unfortunately the label has the LOCAL flag set and Linux
> > > > explicitly ignores pmem namespace labels with that bit set.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dexuan Cui wrote:
>
> > From: Dan Williams
> > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 3:47 PM
> > To: Dexuan Cui
> >
> > I believe it's the same reason. Without 11189c1089da the _LSR method
> > will fail, and otherwise it works and finds the label that it doesn't
> >
> From: Dan Williams
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 3:47 PM
> To: Dexuan Cui
>
> I believe it's the same reason. Without 11189c1089da the _LSR method
> will fail, and otherwise it works and finds the label that it doesn't
> like.
Exactly.
> I'm not seeing "invalid" data in your failure log.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 3:17 PM Dexuan Cui wrote:
>
> > From: Dan Williams
> > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 9:29 AM
> > > Hi Dan,
> > > Unluckily it looks this commit causes a regression ...
> > > With the patch, "ndctl list" shows nothing, and /dev/pmem0 can't appear.
> > > If I revert the
> From: Dan Williams
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 9:29 AM
> > Hi Dan,
> > Unluckily it looks this commit causes a regression ...
> > With the patch, "ndctl list" shows nothing, and /dev/pmem0 can't appear.
> > If I revert the patch, it will be back to normal.
> >
> > I attached the
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:14 AM Dexuan Cui wrote:
>
> > From: Dan Williams
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:24 PM
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:56 PM Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Add the Hyper-V _DSM command set to the white list of NVDIMM command
> > > sets.
> > >
> > > Thanks Dan
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:56 PM Dexuan Cui wrote:
>
>
> Add the Hyper-V _DSM command set to the white list of NVDIMM command
> sets.
>
> This command set is documented at http://www.uefi.org/RFIC_LIST
> (see "Virtual NVDIMM 0x1901").
>
> Thanks Dan Williams for writing the
> comment change.
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
