On 2019/5/28 14:57, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:02:12AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/5/28 10:36, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>> For compressed files, i_blocks should not be calculated
>>> by using i_size. i_u.compressed_blocks is used instead.
>>>
>>> In addition, i_blocks was
Hi Dan,
On 2019/5/28 14:57, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:02:12AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/5/28 10:36, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>> For compressed files, i_blocks should not be calculated
>>> by using i_size. i_u.compressed_blocks is used instead.
>>>
>>> In addition, i_blocks
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:02:12AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/5/28 10:36, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > For compressed files, i_blocks should not be calculated
> > by using i_size. i_u.compressed_blocks is used instead.
> >
> > In addition, i_blocks was miscalculated for non-compressed
> > files
On 2019/5/28 11:02, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/5/28 10:36, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> For compressed files, i_blocks should not be calculated
>> by using i_size. i_u.compressed_blocks is used instead.
>>
>> In addition, i_blocks was miscalculated for non-compressed
>> files previously, fix it as well.
On 2019/5/28 10:36, Gao Xiang wrote:
> For compressed files, i_blocks should not be calculated
> by using i_size. i_u.compressed_blocks is used instead.
>
> In addition, i_blocks was miscalculated for non-compressed
> files previously, fix it as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang
> ---
> change
