On 25/10/16 18:00, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 10/25/2016 06:57 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 24/10/16 16:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> The ad5933_i2c_read function returns an error code to indicate
>>> whether it could read data or not. However ad5933_work() ignores
>>> this return code and
On 10/25/2016 06:57 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 24/10/16 16:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> The ad5933_i2c_read function returns an error code to indicate
>> whether it could read data or not. However ad5933_work() ignores
>> this return code and just accesses the data unconditionally,
>> which
On 24/10/16 16:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The ad5933_i2c_read function returns an error code to indicate
> whether it could read data or not. However ad5933_work() ignores
> this return code and just accesses the data unconditionally,
> which gets detected by gcc as a possible bug:
>
>
The ad5933_i2c_read function returns an error code to indicate
whether it could read data or not. However ad5933_work() ignores
this return code and just accesses the data unconditionally,
which gets detected by gcc as a possible bug:
drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c: In function
