On 2017/12/18 16:54, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Jia-Ju Bai writes:
The kzalloc function is called with GFP_ATOMIC.
But according to driver call graph, it is not in atomic context,
namely no spinlock is held nor in an interrupt handler.
This GFP_ATOMIC is unnecessary,
Jia-Ju Bai writes:
> The kzalloc function is called with GFP_ATOMIC.
> But according to driver call graph, it is not in atomic context,
> namely no spinlock is held nor in an interrupt handler.
>
> This GFP_ATOMIC is unnecessary, and replace with GFP_KERNEL.
>
>
The kzalloc function is called with GFP_ATOMIC.
But according to driver call graph, it is not in atomic context,
namely no spinlock is held nor in an interrupt handler.
This GFP_ATOMIC is unnecessary, and replace with GFP_KERNEL.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai
---