Hello Sudip,
On 09/22/2015 06:52 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 02:39:36AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The driver is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify
>> that a buffer allocation failed. Since the error number is propagated,
>> the caller
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:38:43AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Sudip,
>
> On 09/22/2015 06:52 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 02:39:36AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The driver is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify
>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 02:39:36AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify
> that a buffer allocation failed. Since the error number is propagated,
> the caller will get a -EPERM which is the wrong error condition.
Just a
The driver is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify
that a buffer allocation failed. Since the error number is propagated,
the caller will get a -EPERM which is the wrong error condition.
Also, the smatch tool complains with the following warning:
dgap_parsefile() warn:
