Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad7150: use ternary operating to ensure 0/1 value
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:40:34 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:50:59 -0300 > > Melissa Wen wrote: > > > > > Remove idiom and use ternary operator for consistently trigger 0/1 value > > > on variable declaration. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen > > Hi Melissa, > > > > In general I would consider this unnecessary churn as, whilst > > it's no longer a favoured idiom, it is extremely common in the > > kernel. > > It's still my favourite... Why wouldn't people like it? It feels like > last week I just saw someone send a bunch of: > > - foo = (bar == baz) ? 1 : 0; > + foo = (bar == baz); > > patches and I thought it was an improvement at the time... That one is nice enough, it's the !! that Linus came out fairly strongly against though not sure I can find the particular email. That one is a fairly kernel specific idiom that I'll be honest I've rarely seen elsewhere ;) I remember wincing at the thread on this as it was an idiom I personally rather liked. In cases where it doesn't matter because foo doesn't need to 1 or 0 then what you have is nice and clean. I can't say it's one I care that much about, but I am happy if code that happens to be under cleanup anyway has this little bit made the 'preferred style'. There is something to said for consistency. Jonathan > > regards, > dan carpenter > ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad7150: use ternary operating to ensure 0/1 value
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:50:59 -0300 > Melissa Wen wrote: > > > Remove idiom and use ternary operator for consistently trigger 0/1 value > > on variable declaration. > > > > Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen > Hi Melissa, > > In general I would consider this unnecessary churn as, whilst > it's no longer a favoured idiom, it is extremely common in the > kernel. It's still my favourite... Why wouldn't people like it? It feels like last week I just saw someone send a bunch of: - foo = (bar == baz) ? 1 : 0; + foo = (bar == baz); patches and I thought it was an improvement at the time... regards, dan carpenter ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad7150: use ternary operating to ensure 0/1 value
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:50:59 -0300
Melissa Wen wrote:
> Remove idiom and use ternary operator for consistently trigger 0/1 value
> on variable declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen
Hi Melissa,
In general I would consider this unnecessary churn as, whilst
it's no longer a favoured idiom, it is extremely common in the
kernel. However, as this is a staging cleanup, fair enough to
make it as 'nice as possible'!
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
> b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
> index 8234da4b8c65..25598bf124fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
> @@ -350,8 +350,8 @@ static ssize_t ad7150_show_timeout(struct device *dev,
>
> /* use the event code for consistency reasons */
> int chan = IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_CHAN(this_attr->address);
> - int rising = !!(IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_DIR(this_attr->address)
> - == IIO_EV_DIR_RISING);
> + int rising = (IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_DIR(this_attr->address)
> + == IIO_EV_DIR_RISING) ? 1 : 0;
>
> switch (IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_TYPE(this_attr->address)) {
> case IIO_EV_TYPE_MAG_ADAPTIVE:
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
[PATCH] staging: iio: ad7150: use ternary operating to ensure 0/1 value
Remove idiom and use ternary operator for consistently trigger 0/1 value
on variable declaration.
Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen
---
drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
index 8234da4b8c65..25598bf124fb 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
@@ -350,8 +350,8 @@ static ssize_t ad7150_show_timeout(struct device *dev,
/* use the event code for consistency reasons */
int chan = IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_CHAN(this_attr->address);
- int rising = !!(IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_DIR(this_attr->address)
- == IIO_EV_DIR_RISING);
+ int rising = (IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_DIR(this_attr->address)
+ == IIO_EV_DIR_RISING) ? 1 : 0;
switch (IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_TYPE(this_attr->address)) {
case IIO_EV_TYPE_MAG_ADAPTIVE:
--
2.20.1
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
