On 03/05/2014 04:39 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Btw, if you don't get any messages from me that means I have given your
patch the stamp of approval. So good job on your previous patchset. :)
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:54:49PM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
@@ -1613,7 +1616,8 @@ static void
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:19:08AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
Function arguments line up:
memcpy(ch-ch_sniff_buf + ch-ch_sniff_in, p,
r);
As you say below, Breaking the lines up like this isn't ideal.
This one I feel
Btw, if you don't get any messages from me that means I have given your
patch the stamp of approval. So good job on your previous patchset. :)
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:54:49PM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
@@ -1613,7 +1616,8 @@ static void dgap_tty_uninit(struct board_t *brd)
* dgap_sniff
