On 03/08/2019 2:41 am, John Hubbard wrote:
On 8/2/19 6:27 PM, Calum Mackay wrote:
On 02/08/2019 3:20 am, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Since it's static, and only called twice, might it be better to change its two
callers [nfs_direct_{read,write}_schedule_iovec()] to call
On 8/2/19 6:27 PM, Calum Mackay wrote:
> On 02/08/2019 3:20 am, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> Since it's static, and only called twice, might it be better to change its
> two callers [nfs_direct_{read,write}_schedule_iovec()] to call
> put_user_pages() directly, and remove
On 02/08/2019 3:20 am, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: John Hubbard
For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages
via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or
release_pages().
This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit
From: John Hubbard
For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages
via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or
release_pages().
This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d
("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder
