On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 08:19:21PM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> In that case, rather than removing it, shouldn't we be *adding*
> code to properly set it instead?
Right, setting the UtcOffset fields to 0 is the first step marking
them as invalid for now. This is also why access_time_ms did
On Sun, 08 Sep 2019 16:10:14 -, Valentin Vidic said:
> Not used in the exfat-fuse implementation and spec defines
> this position should hold the value for CreateUtcOffset.
In that case, rather than removing it, shouldn't we be *adding*
code to properly set it instead?
pgpDFfdaGOzRf.pgp
On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 04:10:14PM +, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> Not used in the exfat-fuse implementation and spec defines
> this position should hold the value for CreateUtcOffset.
Then why not just put CreateUtcOffset in here instaed of deleting it?
I would much rather the fields match the
Not used in the exfat-fuse implementation and spec defines
this position should hold the value for CreateUtcOffset.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Vidic
---
drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h | 3 +--
drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
