On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> The killable version of wait_for_completion() is meant to be used on
> situations where it should not fail at all costs, but still have the
> convenience of being able to kill it if really necessary. VCHIQ doesn't
> fit this
Hi Nicolas,
Am 06.05.19 um 17:59 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
> Hi Dan, thanks for reviewing.
>
> On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 18:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>>> @@ -1740,7 +1740,8 @@ parse_rx_slots(struct vchiq_state
Hi Dan, thanks for reviewing.
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 18:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > @@ -1740,7 +1740,8 @@ parse_rx_slots(struct vchiq_state *state)
> > >bulk_rx : >bulk_tx;
> >
>
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> @@ -1740,7 +1740,8 @@ parse_rx_slots(struct vchiq_state *state)
> >bulk_rx : >bulk_tx;
>
> DEBUG_TRACE(PARSE_LINE);
> - if
The killable version of wait_for_completion() is meant to be used on
situations where it should not fail at all costs, but still have the
convenience of being able to kill it if really necessary. VCHIQ doesn't
fit this criteria, as it's mainly used as an interface to V4L2 and ALSA
devices.
Fixes: