On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:29:49PM +, Simmons, James A. wrote:
>
> >> > > so the right code should be:
> >> > >
> >> > > sizeof(**net->ibn_tx_ps);
> >> > > and the same for sizeof(**net->ibn_fmr_ps)
> >> > That's a mess, isn't there some other way to fix this up to be more
> >> >
>> > > so the right code should be:
>> > >
>> > > sizeof(**net->ibn_tx_ps);
>> > > and the same for sizeof(**net->ibn_fmr_ps)
>> > That's a mess, isn't there some other way to fix this up to be more
>> > "obvious"?
>> This must have been encountered in the past. How was it handle in
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 18:31 +, Simmons, James A. wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:39:36AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> > > On 2016/03/22, 19:49, "lustre-devel on behalf of Greg Kroah-Hartman"
> > > > > gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
>On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:39:36AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
>> On 2016/03/22, 19:49, "lustre-devel on behalf of Greg Kroah-Hartman"
>> > gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:21:04PM -0400, James Simmons
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:39:36AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> On 2016/03/22, 19:49, "lustre-devel on behalf of Greg Kroah-Hartman"
> gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:21:04PM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
>
Yes, those are “per-CPT allocations”. So the allocator ends up allocating an
array of pointers to the given data type.
Doug
On Mar 22, 2016, at 10:39 PM, Dilger, Andreas
> wrote:
On 2016/03/22, 19:49, "lustre-devel on behalf of Greg
On 2016/03/22, 19:49, "lustre-devel on behalf of Greg Kroah-Hartman"
wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:21:04PM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
>> Latest testing fails when using ko2iblnd. It was tracked down
>> to commit