Re: conflict of hyperv_fb and the generic video driver?

2013-08-16 Thread David Herrmann
Hi (hint: your mail header seems to drop Reference-to/Reply-to headers and breaks thread-info) On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Haiyang Zhang haiya...@microsoft.com wrote: -Original Message- From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:46 AM

RE: conflict of hyperv_fb and the generic video driver?

2013-08-16 Thread Haiyang Zhang
Srinivasan Subject: Re: conflict of hyperv_fb and the generic video driver? Hi (hint: your mail header seems to drop Reference-to/Reply-to headers and breaks thread-info) On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Haiyang Zhang haiya...@microsoft.com wrote: -Original Message- From

Re: conflict of hyperv_fb and the generic video driver?

2013-08-16 Thread David Herrmann
; Tomi Valkeinen; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard; akpm@linux- foundation.org; KY Srinivasan Subject: Re: conflict of hyperv_fb and the generic video driver? Hi (hint: your mail header seems to drop Reference-to/Reply-to headers and breaks thread-info) On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:45 PM

Re: conflict of hyperv_fb and the generic video driver?

2013-08-16 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Haiyang Zhang haiya...@microsoft.com wrote: But I saw VESA VBE in the x log. Seems it's the default driver: /var/log/Xorg.0.log: [12.340] (II) VESA(0): Primary V_BIOS segment is: 0xc000 [12.341] (II) VESA(0): VESA BIOS detected [12.341]

RE: conflict of hyperv_fb and the generic video driver?

2013-08-16 Thread Haiyang Zhang
Srinivasan Subject: Re: conflict of hyperv_fb and the generic video driver? Hi On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Haiyang Zhang haiya...@microsoft.com wrote: -Original Message- From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 3:11 PM