Only: sm85sm...@gmail.com
TNKS IN MILLION FOR YOUR URGENT RESPONSE
Best regards.
Mr Roland Max
Happy new week.
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Hello Dear I am Mrs. Ingram Olivia, I have decided to donate what I
have to Motherless babies/ Less privileged/ Widows' because I am
dying and diagnosed for cancer for about 10 years ago. I have been
touched by God Almighty to donate from what I have inherited from my
late husband to you for good
Attention, Beneficiary:
This Letter Is from the Federal Ministry of Finance. During Our
Comprehensive Investigations Regarding Your Inability To Receive Your
Over Due Payment We Discovered That You Have Been Dealing With A Set
Of Corrupt Government Officials Who Have Been Making Frantic Efforts
I am Mr Greg Rhodes a supervisor at a gold mining site in Sierra Leone.
Due to Covid-19 some of our customers are not picking up their orders, thus,
there is a glut of gold bars in our safe.
In view of this, we are seriously looking for buyers. Our prices are favourable
and the business is
This mail is been writing to you because we have come to understand that
you have lost a lot of money all because you want to receive your fund
well note that all that have been put to a stop as the federal government of
Nigeria has promised to assist you with the sum of five million American
Greeting!
I am contacting you to receive and share with me an abandoned fund (
$21,537.000.00 ) left in our bank by a deceased customer. I was going through
the Internet search when I found your email address. My name is Mr. Kim Leang.
I want to utilize this opportunity and make use of this
Hello Dear,
I am Klen Tindle by name, from America and working with the USA
military still on a mission in Afghanistan. I really need your
assistance that is the reason why I contacted you, I want to go
into a cordial relationship and business partnership with you, as
I don't know how long we
Dear Sir/Madam,
My Names are Mr.Alfredo Gomez. I am the Administrative manager at a vault
financial & security Institution here in Madrid. I am contacting you based on a
financial opportunity I discovered here in my organization. It's about an
abandoned sum of 25,000,000.00 million US dollars
My Dear Friend,
Let me first of all inform you, I got your email address from a mail Directory
and decided to mail you for a permission to go ahead. I am Mrs. Anna Blair from
United Kingdom, married to Dr. Anthony R. Blair who worked with Texaco Oil
Company in Malaysia before he died in a
Hello my dear.
Did you receive my email message to you? Please, get back to me ASAP as the
matter is becoming late. Expecting your urgent response.
Sean.
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org
wilc *wilc, u8
*frame, int size,
msg_id = frame[1]; /* seq no */
frame += 4;
size -= 4;
+ rsp->type = 0;
/*
* The valid types of response messages are
@@ -532,7 +533,6 @@ void wilc_wlan_cfg_indicate_rx(struct wilc *wilc, u8
*frame, int s
wilc *wilc, u8
*frame, int size,
msg_id = frame[1]; /* seq no */
frame += 4;
size -= 4;
+ rsp->type = 0;
/*
* The valid types of response messages are
@@ -532,7 +533,6 @@ void wilc_wlan_cfg_indicate_rx(struct wilc *wilc, u8
*frame, int s
wilc *wilc, u8
*frame, int size,
msg_id = frame[1]; /* seq no */
frame += 4;
size -= 4;
+ rsp->type = 0;
/*
* The valid types of response messages are
@@ -532,7 +533,6 @@ void wilc_wlan_cfg_indicate_rx(struct wilc *wilc, u8
*frame, int s
The response type of the SD_APP_OP_COND command is correctly
determined using the mmc_resp_type macro, because the only use of that
opcode, mmc_send_app_op_cond, correctly places MMC_RSP_R3 in cmd.flags.
So there is no need to treat that opcode separately.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lütke
The response type of the MMC_SEND_OP_COND command is correctly
determined using the mmc_resp_type macro, because the only use of that
opcode, mmc_send_op_cond, correctly places MMC_RSP_R3 in cmd.flags.
So there is no need to treat that opcode separately.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lütke-Stetzkamp
The response type of the SD_APP_OP_COND command is correctly
determined using the mmc_resp_type macro, because the only use of that
opcode, mmc_send_app_op_cond, correctly places MMC_RSP_R3 in cmd.flags.
So there is no need to treat that opcode separately.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lütke
The response type of the MMC_SEND_OP_COND command is correctly
determined using the mmc_resp_type macro, because the only use of that
opcode, mmc_send_op_cond, correctly places MMC_RSP_R3 in cmd.flags.
So there is no need to treat that opcode separately.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lütke-Stetzkamp
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 01:32:38PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> When not associated with an AP, wifi device drivers should respond to the
> SIOCGIWESSID ioctl with a zero-length string for the SSID, which is the
> behavior expected by dhcpcd.
>
> Currently, this driver returns an error code (-1)
When not associated with an AP, wifi device drivers should respond to the
SIOCGIWESSID ioctl with a zero-length string for the SSID, which is the
behavior expected by dhcpcd.
Currently, this driver returns an error code (-1) from the ioctl call,
which causes dhcpcd to assume that the device is
tus code 0x%x", errcode);
+ "Authentication response status code 0x%x",
+ errcode);
rtllib_associate_abort(ieee);
return;
}
--
2.11.0
___
devel mailing
There are several different controlvm response functions, consolidate them
to one so we can simplify error handling.
Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kersh...@unisys.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Sell <timothy.s...@unisys.com>
---
drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorch
The function my_device_changestate was not sending a response if there
was an error with the CONTROLVM message.
Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kersh...@unisys.com>
Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Sell <timothy.s...@unisys.co
This patch addresses the problem that we were sending double responses
back to the s-Par Firmware when processing CONTROLVM Messages. Every
message responds individually and the epilog functions would send a
response as well.
Since a message could delay the response, it was decided to remove
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Rui Miguel Silva <rmf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When checking for command flags field if response is not available we
> really need to compare it with the right define and not bitwise AND it.
>
> smatch warn:
> drivers/stagi
When checking for command flags field if response is not available we
really need to compare it with the right define and not bitwise AND it.
smatch warn:
drivers/staging/greybus/sdio.c:481 gb_sdio_command()
warn: bitwise AND condition is false here
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
When checking for command flags field if response is not available we
really need to compare it with the right define and not bitwise AND it.
smatch warn:
drivers/staging/greybus/sdio.c:481 gb_sdio_command()
warn: bitwise AND condition is false here
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
Hello !
accept my sincere apologies for my mode of contacting you out of the blues like
this but something very urgent and important has come to my notice and I
strongly believe it’s important we seek your consent for the mutual interest of
all.
I am Daniel H.William Auditor General of
From: David Kershner david.kersh...@unisys.com
When s-Par is in polling mode it checks every 2 ms to see if there is
a response from the IO service partition in the queue. Currently it
just reads one entry per 2 ms, this needs to be changed so it drains
the queue on each check.
Signed-off
...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: make INQUIRY response SPC-compliant
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:04:08AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
SPC-2/3/4 specs state that The standard INQUIRY data (see table ...)
shall contain at least 36 bytes. Hyper-V host
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: make INQUIRY response SPC-compliant
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:04:08AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
SPC-2/3/4 specs state that The standard INQUIRY data (see table ...)
shall contain at least 36 bytes. Hyper-V host doesn't always honor this
requirement
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:04:08AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
SPC-2/3/4 specs state that The standard INQUIRY data (see table ...)
shall contain at least 36 bytes. Hyper-V host doesn't always honor this
requirement, e.g. when there is no physical device present at a particular
LUN host
SPC-2/3/4 specs state that The standard INQUIRY data (see table ...)
shall contain at least 36 bytes. Hyper-V host doesn't always honor this
requirement, e.g. when there is no physical device present at a particular
LUN host sets Peripheral qualifier to 011b and Additional length to 0
(thus making
I am Eng. Mahmoud Zayak from Syria. I am looking for a possible tie up with a
business or individual in your country so that I can do some investments there.
Kindly, reply me so that we can discuss further.
Best Regards
Eng.Mahmoud Zayak
___
devel
I am Eng. Mahmoud Zayak from Syria. I am looking for a possible tie up with a
business or individual in your country so that I can do some investments there.
Kindly, reply me so that we can discuss further.
Best Regards
Eng.Mahmoud Zayak
___
devel
tracking number will be send to you as well.
Please forward to me your vital details in other for us to conclude this
transaction with immediate effect
I wait for your immediate response once you received this email.
Thanks,
MR. GOODWILL KOFI BISSUE
Email: goodwill_kofi_bissue2...@yahoo.com
On 15 August 2014 08:06, rogera...@realtek.com wrote:
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, the controller actually 'offloads' the last byte
(CRC7, end bit) while receiving R2 response and thus
On 15 August 2014 08:06, rogera...@realtek.com wrote:
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, the controller actually 'offloads' the last byte
(CRC7, end bit) while receiving R2 response and thus
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, the controller actually 'offloads' the last byte
(CRC7, end bit) while receiving R2 response and thus it's impossible to get the
actual value. This could cause
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
(The original patch for PCI and USB was splitted here to make it easier for
stable tree.)
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, the controller actually 'offloads' the last byte
(CRC7, end bit
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, the controller actually 'offloads' the last byte
(CRC7, end bit) while receiving R2 response and thus it's impossible to get the
actual value. This could cause
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 17:09 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 11 August 2014 10:32, rogera...@realtek.com wrote:
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, it is impossible to obtain the real values
On 14 August 2014 08:06, Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 17:09 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 11 August 2014 10:32, rogera...@realtek.com wrote:
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:19:12PM +0800, Roger wrote:
I can remove the unused rsp_len in this function. But I'm afraid the
loop is still required. The destination cmd-resp is cpu-endian, but
the raw response from SD card in the buffer (pointed by ptr) is
big-endian.
Oh, yes. Of course
On 11 August 2014 10:32, rogera...@realtek.com wrote:
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, it is impossible to obtain the real values since the
controller actually 'offloads' the last byte
On 08/11/2014 09:02 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:32:16PM +0800, rogera...@realtek.com wrote:
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, it is impossible to obtain the real
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, it is impossible to obtain the real values since the
controller actually 'offloads' the last byte(CRC7, end bit) while receiving R2
response. This could cause
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:32:16PM +0800, rogera...@realtek.com wrote:
From: Roger Tseng rogera...@realtek.com
Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
value. In addition, it is impossible to obtain the real values since the
controller actually 'offloads
Hello,
I am Mrs. Supini Thrunkul from Tai Yau Bank Hong Kong, I need your cooperation
to transfer $ 47.3 million US Dollars to any trusted account within your
control.
Contact me for more details.
Mrs. Supini Thrunkul
Tel: +85 2580 848 65
___
48 matches
Mail list logo
