05.06.2020 09:00, Jon Hunter пишет:
>
> On 02/06/2020 06:48, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
>> Call to pm_runtime_get_sync increments counter even in case of
>> failure leading to incorrect ref count.
>> Call pm_runtime_put_autosuspend if pm_runtime_get_sync fails.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost
On 02/06/2020 06:48, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> Call to pm_runtime_get_sync increments counter even in case of
> failure leading to incorrect ref count.
> Call pm_runtime_put_autosuspend if pm_runtime_get_sync fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost
> ---
>
> Call to pm_runtime_get_sync increments counter even in case of
> failure leading to incorrect ref count.
> Call pm_runtime_put_autosuspend if pm_runtime_get_sync fails.
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Change description:
The PM runtime reference counter is
