Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 4 April 2018 at 21:56, Boris Brezillon wrote: >> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200 >> Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> >>> Ulf Hansson writes: >>> >>> > On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and >>> >> transfer >>> >> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code. >>> >> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree >>> >> either >>> >> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next >>> >> iterations >>> >> of this serie. >>> > >>> > Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that >>> > would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you >>> > receive the needed acks of course. >>> For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have >>> all >> >> Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-), >> but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1. > > Yeah, I realize that I was a bit lost in time yesterday. Even more > people have been having fun about it (me too). :-) I occasionally still type 2.6.17 when I mean 4.17. Arnd ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps
On 4 April 2018 at 21:56, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200 > Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> Ulf Hansson writes: >> >> > On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and >> >> transfer >> >> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code. >> >> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree >> >> either >> >> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next >> >> iterations >> >> of this serie. >> > >> > Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that >> > would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you >> > receive the needed acks of course. >> For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all > > Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-), > but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1. Yeah, I realize that I was a bit lost in time yesterday. Even more people have been having fun about it (me too). :-) Kind regards Uffe ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Ulf Hansson writes: > > > On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and > >> transfer > >> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code. > >> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree > >> either > >> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next > >> iterations > >> of this serie. > > > > Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that > > would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you > > receive the needed acks of course. > For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-), but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1. > acks, I'll queue it into my pxa tree. If at least one maintainer withholds his > ack, the end of the serie (phase 3) won't be applied until it is sorted out. > > Cheers. > > -- > Robert ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps
Ulf Hansson writes: > On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer >> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code. >> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree >> either >> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next >> iterations >> of this serie. > > Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that > would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you > receive the needed acks of course. For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all acks, I'll queue it into my pxa tree. If at least one maintainer withholds his ack, the end of the serie (phase 3) won't be applied until it is sorted out. Cheers. -- Robert ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps
On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hi, > > This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer > knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code. > > This was discussed/advised by Arnd a couple of years back, it's almost time. > > The serie is divided in 3 phasees : > - phase 1 : patch 1/15 and patch 2/15 >=> this is the preparation work > - phase 2 : patches 3/15 .. 10/15 >=> this is the switch of all the drivers >=> this one will require either an Ack of the maintainers or be taken by > them > once phase 1 is merged > - phase 3 : patches 11/15 >=> this is the last part, cleanup and removal of export of the DMA filter > function > > As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree > either > an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next > iterations > of this serie. Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you receive the needed acks of course. For the mmc change: Acked-by: Ulf Hansson Kind regards Uffe > > Several of these changes have been tested on actual hardware, including : > - pxamci > - pxa_camera > - smc* > - ASoC and SSP > > Happy review. > > Robert Jarzmik (15): > dmaengine: pxa: use a dma slave map > ARM: pxa: add dma slave map > mmc: pxamci: remove the dmaengine compat need > media: pxa_camera: remove the dmaengine compat need > mtd: nand: pxa3xx: remove the dmaengine compat need > net: smc911x: remove the dmaengine compat need > net: smc91x: remove the dmaengine compat need > ASoC: pxa: remove the dmaengine compat need > net: irda: pxaficp_ir: remove the dmaengine compat need > ata: pata_pxa: remove the dmaengine compat need > dmaengine: pxa: document pxad_param > dmaengine: pxa: make the filter function internal > ARM: pxa: remove the DMA IO resources > ARM: pxa: change SSP devices allocation > ARM: pxa: change SSP DMA channels allocation > > arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c | 269 > ++ > arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.h | 14 +- > arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/audio.h| 12 ++ > arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa25x.c| 4 +- > arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c| 4 +- > arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c| 5 +- > arch/arm/plat-pxa/ssp.c | 50 +- > drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c| 10 +- > drivers/dma/pxa_dma.c | 13 +- > drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c | 22 +-- > drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c | 29 +--- > drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c| 10 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c | 16 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c| 12 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.h| 1 - > drivers/staging/irda/drivers/pxaficp_ir.c | 14 +- > include/linux/dma/pxa-dma.h | 20 +-- > include/linux/platform_data/mmp_dma.h | 4 + > include/linux/pxa2xx_ssp.h| 4 +- > sound/arm/pxa2xx-ac97.c | 14 +- > sound/arm/pxa2xx-pcm-lib.c| 6 +- > sound/soc/pxa/pxa-ssp.c | 5 +- > sound/soc/pxa/pxa2xx-ac97.c | 32 +--- > 23 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.11.0 > ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hi, > > This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer > knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code. > > This was discussed/advised by Arnd a couple of years back, it's almost time. > > The serie is divided in 3 phasees : > - phase 1 : patch 1/15 and patch 2/15 >=> this is the preparation work > - phase 2 : patches 3/15 .. 10/15 >=> this is the switch of all the drivers >=> this one will require either an Ack of the maintainers or be taken by > them > once phase 1 is merged > - phase 3 : patches 11/15 >=> this is the last part, cleanup and removal of export of the DMA filter > function > > As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree > either > an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next > iterations > of this serie. > > Several of these changes have been tested on actual hardware, including : > - pxamci > - pxa_camera > - smc* > - ASoC and SSP > > Happy review. This looks really great overall, thanks for cleaning this up! The SSP part is still a bit weird, as I commented, but I'm sure we can figure something out there. Arnd ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
