On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:33:46PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> Add new 'mt7621_pcie_port' struct as data for the pci controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuel...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c 
> b/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c
> index 4f56840..58c77bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ static int pcie_link_status = 0;
>  #define PCI_ACCESS_WRITE_2 4
>  #define PCI_ACCESS_WRITE_4 5
>  
> +/**
> + * struct mt7621_pcie_port - PCIe port information
> + * @reg_base: IO Mapped Register Base
> + * @dev: Device pointer
> + */
> +struct mt7621_pcie_port {
> +     void __iomem *reg_base;
> +     struct device *dev;
> +};

Ok, something is really odd here.

A PCI driver should not have to mess with structures like this and have
to create "fake" struct pci_dev, right?

Or is this code really the PCI bridge code to create PCI devices?  I
can't figure it out.  It has a pcibios override function, which the pci
core calls to set things up, and should never be in a driver, but should
be in pci core code for the platform.  Is that what this is?

What exactly is this code supposed to be doing?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to