On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:02:13AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:02:39AM +0300, Wambui Karuga wrote:
> > -typedef union {
> > +union cvmx_helper_link_info_t {
>
> I agree with Julia, all of the "_t" needs to be dropped as that is
> pointless. It's a holdover from the original
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:02:39AM +0300, Wambui Karuga wrote:
> -typedef union {
> +union cvmx_helper_link_info_t {
I agree with Julia, all of the "_t" needs to be dropped as that is
pointless. It's a holdover from the original name where "_t" was trying
to say that this is a typedef. Gotta lov
