Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] netvsc: another VF datapath fix

2017-08-09 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 09 Aug 2017 11:03:05 +0200 Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Stephen Hemminger writes: > > > The following would allow udev a chance at the device. > > > > This would of course work but the approach is a bit hackish and can > still fail on a loaded system. Raising the pause interval would be

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] netvsc: another VF datapath fix

2017-08-09 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Stephen Hemminger writes: > The following would allow udev a chance at the device. > This would of course work but the approach is a bit hackish and can still fail on a loaded system. Raising the pause interval would be an option, but again, probably not the best one. Let me try to send an RFC

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] netvsc: another VF datapath fix

2017-08-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The following would allow udev a chance at the device. >From 37fb240a6107834c3dd3f57caede9d73b807f414 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 08:39:24 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] netvsc: delay setup of VF device When VF device is discovered, delay bring it automatical

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] netvsc: another VF datapath fix

2017-08-08 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Stephen Hemminger writes: > On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:24:03 +0200 > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Stephen Hemminger writes: >> >> > On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:03:56 +0200 >> > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> > >> >> Stephen Hemminger writes: >> >> >> >> > Previous fix was incomplete. >> >> > >>

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] netvsc: another VF datapath fix

2017-08-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:24:03 +0200 Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Stephen Hemminger writes: > > > On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:03:56 +0200 > > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > > >> Stephen Hemminger writes: > >> > >> > Previous fix was incomplete. > >> > > >> > >> Not really related to this patch s

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] netvsc: another VF datapath fix

2017-08-08 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Stephen Hemminger writes: > On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:03:56 +0200 > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Stephen Hemminger writes: >> >> > Previous fix was incomplete. >> > >> >> Not really related to this patch series (which btw fixes my issue, >> thanks!), but I found one addition issue. Systemd fai

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] netvsc: another VF datapath fix

2017-08-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:03:56 +0200 Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Stephen Hemminger writes: > > > Previous fix was incomplete. > > > > Not really related to this patch series (which btw fixes my issue, > thanks!), but I found one addition issue. Systemd fails to rename VF > interface: > > kerne

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] netvsc: another VF datapath fix

2017-08-08 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Stephen Hemminger writes: > Previous fix was incomplete. > Not really related to this patch series (which btw fixes my issue, thanks!), but I found one addition issue. Systemd fails to rename VF interface: kernel: mlx4_core 0002:00:02.0 eth2: joined to eth1 kernel: hv_netvsc 33b7a6f9-6736-451