On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue
wrote:
>
>
> On 03/11/17 20:21, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:01 PM, wrote:
On 03/11/17 20:21, Kees Cook wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:01 PM, wrote:
There's a separate change to loopback.c an old patch ARAIR that will subtract
use of the timer from
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:01 PM, wrote:
>> There's a separate change to loopback.c an old patch ARAIR that will
>> subtract use of the timer from loopback.c so you can skip that bit.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:01 PM, wrote:
> On 30 October 2017 9:37:37 p.m. GMT+00:00, Kees Cook
> wrote:
>>On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:44:22AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue
On 30 October 2017 9:37:37 p.m. GMT+00:00, Kees Cook
wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:44:22AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30/10/17 11:38, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Oct
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:44:22AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/10/17 11:38, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:35:50AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> >> On 30/10/17 11:32, Johan Hovold
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:44:22AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>
>
> On 30/10/17 11:38, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:35:50AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> >> On 30/10/17 11:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> The right thing to do here is to respin your patch from last year
On 30/10/17 11:38, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:35:50AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 30/10/17 11:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
The right thing to do here is to respin your patch from last year which
converts the loopback driver to use the timeout handling in greybus
core.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:35:50AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 30/10/17 11:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > The right thing to do here is to respin your patch from last year which
> > converts the loopback driver to use the timeout handling in greybus
> > core.
>
> Actually I wasn't clear if
On 30/10/17 11:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
The right thing to do here is to respin your patch from last year which
converts the loopback driver to use the timeout handling in greybus
core.
Actually I wasn't clear if you wanted to to that yourself aswell as the
rest if it.
But sure I can do that
[ Resend to Bryan's nexus-software address ]
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 04:54:59PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 24/10/17 15:49, Kees Cook wrote:
> > In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> > all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 04:54:59PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 24/10/17 15:49, Kees Cook wrote:
> > In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> > all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> > to pass the timer pointer
On 24/10/17 15:49, Kees Cook wrote:
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: "Bryan
13 matches
Mail list logo