On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:53:02 -0700
John Syne wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 01:29:41 -0700
> > John Syne wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jonathan,
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Please wrap your normal emails (excepting tables) to 80 chars.
> Yeah,
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:36:40 -0700
John Syne wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:45:21 -0700
> > John Syne wrote:
> >
> >>> On Mar 24, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:57:16 -0700
> >>>
> On Mar 25, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 01:29:41 -0700
> John Syne wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
> Hi John,
>
> Please wrap your normal emails (excepting tables) to 80 chars.
Yeah, I’m trying to do that, but I use a Mac and Apple Mail doesn’t
have a feature t
>
> On Mar 25, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:06:17 -0700
> John Syne wrote:
>
> This thread is becoming unmanageable so I am cropping this down to just
> the questions that remain open.
>
Probably easier to copy and paste this table into a spreadshe
> On Mar 25, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:06:17 -0700
> John Syne wrote:
>
> This thread is becoming unmanageable so I am cropping this down to just
> the questions that remain open.
>
Probably easier to copy and paste this table into a spreadsheet
> On Mar 25, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:45:21 -0700
> John Syne wrote:
>
>>> On Mar 24, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:57:16 -0700
>>> John Syne wrote:
>>>
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for all you
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 01:29:41 -0700
John Syne wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
Hi John,
Please wrap your normal emails (excepting tables) to 80 chars.
>
> I was speaking with Rodrigo and here is what I think must be done to move
> ADE7878 out of staging
>
> Here are the steps as I see them:
>
> 1) Defin
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:06:17 -0700
John Syne wrote:
This thread is becoming unmanageable so I am cropping this down to just
the questions that remain open.
> >> Probably easier to copy and paste this table into a spreadsheet. Let me
> >> know if there is anything I got wrong. Thank you again fo
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:45:21 -0700
John Syne wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:57:16 -0700
> > John Syne wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jonathan,
> >>
> >> Thank you for all your hard work. Your feedback is really helpful. I’m
> >> surprise
Hi Jonathan,
I was speaking with Rodrigo and here is what I think must be done to move
ADE7878 out of staging
Here are the steps as I see them:
1) Define the IIO Attributes so they are consistent with the IIO ABI. This
should be pretty simple given agreement on the naming convention.
2) Map t
> On Mar 24, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:28:45 -0700
> John Syne wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> I broke out the {Direction}_{Type}_{Index}_{Modifier}_{Info_Mask} into
>> separate columns to make sure I understand your instructions. Good way to
>> che
Hi Jonathan,
I have attached a CSV version of this table below. Hopefully that will make
things easier for you.
RegisterIIO Attribute Device Tree or Code Direction type
Index ModifierInfo Mask
AIGAIN in_current0_phaseA_scalein current 0
> On Mar 24, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:57:16 -0700
> John Syne wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> Thank you for all your hard work. Your feedback is really helpful. I’m
>> surprised that no one from Analog Device has offered any suggestions.
>>
>
> S
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:28:45 -0700
John Syne wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I broke out the {Direction}_{Type}_{Index}_{Modifier}_{Info_Mask} into
> separate columns to make sure I understand your instructions. Good way to
> check the results.
>
> Probably easier to copy and paste this table into
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:57:16 -0700
John Syne wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Thank you for all your hard work. Your feedback is really helpful. I’m
> surprised that no one from Analog Device has offered any suggestions.
>
Sadly those active in the mainline linux kernel from ADI are focused in
other
Hi Jonathan,
I broke out the {Direction}_{Type}_{Index}_{Modifier}_{Info_Mask} into separate
columns to make sure I understand your instructions. Good way to check the
results.
Probably easier to copy and paste this table into a spreadsheet. Let me know if
there is anything I got wrong. Thank
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for all your hard work. Your feedback is really helpful. I’m
surprised that no one from Analog Device has offered any suggestions.
Anyway, please see my comments inline below
Regards,
John
> On Mar 18, 2018, at 5:23 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 20
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 23:11:45 -0700
John Syne wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
Hi John and All,
I'd love to get some additional input on this from anyone interested.
There are a lot of weird and wonderful derived quantities in an energy
meter and it seems we need to make some fundamental changes to support
Hi Jonathan,
Here is the complete list of registers for the ADE7878 which I copied from the
data sheet. I added a column “IIO Attribute” which I hope follows your IIO ABI.
Please make any changes you feel are incorrect. BTW, there are several
registers that cannot be generalized and are used pu
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 23:12:02 -0700
John Syne wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I have been looking at the IIO ABI docs and if I understand
> correctly, the idea is to use consistent naming conventions? So for
> example, looking at the ADE7854 datasheet, the naming matching the
> ADE7854 registers would
Hi Jonathan,
I have been looking at the IIO ABI docs and if I understand correctly, the idea
is to use consistent naming conventions? So for example, looking at the ADE7854
datasheet, the naming matching the ADE7854 registers would be as follows:
{direction}_{type}_{index}_{modifier}_{info_mask
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 21:37:33 -0300
Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> On 03/07, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:43:47 -0300
> > Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> >
> > > The macro IIO_DEV_ATTR_CH_OFF is a wrapper for IIO_DEVICE_ATTR, with a
> > > tiny change in the name definition. This extra
On 03/07, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:43:47 -0300
> Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
>
> > The macro IIO_DEV_ATTR_CH_OFF is a wrapper for IIO_DEVICE_ATTR, with a
> > tiny change in the name definition. This extra macro does not improve
> > the readability and also creates some checkpat
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:43:47 -0300
Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> The macro IIO_DEV_ATTR_CH_OFF is a wrapper for IIO_DEVICE_ATTR, with a
> tiny change in the name definition. This extra macro does not improve
> the readability and also creates some checkpatch errors.
>
> This patch fixes the checkpatc
24 matches
Mail list logo