Re: [droolers] bsf integration

2001-12-12 Thread James Strachan
here's my preference: 1. Ease of use. 2. Run-time extensibility. 3. Speed. I think that's the priority list I'm using to direct my activities. +1. Speed can come later. Premature optimisation is the root of all evil and all that. James

Re: [droolers] Wicked (We now have a rules-file format)

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
[[ cc:'d to the list ]] I'm having problems trying to access to cvs, we are using a proxy that almost never works :( Hmmm... Then tarballs work best for you, right? I'll see if I can't get nightly snapshots auto-building for ya. Might be a few days, though. James-- You have

[droolers] unplug

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
Well kids, I'm unplugging for the night. I think the Java Semantic Module is Done. I've included ease-of-use features. Tomorrow, I'll work on examples and end-user documentation (as opposed to simply the nearly-complete JavaDocs). Now's the time to start banging on it, and let me know what

[droolers] WorkFlow Engine

2001-12-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I am very interested in making a workflow engine (as I'm sure others on this list are interested in doing) and I wanted to know if anything has started in earnest based on drools? I've a couple commercial packages that look really neat: http://www.dralasoft.com/products/workflow/index.html