I think this is a sensible proposal.
And I agree that 881 is a bug fix and shouldn't be subject to deferral
by the Feature Freeze, though I'd be concerned if a fix didn't land
well in advance of Testathon.
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Asking whether markets are effic
I mostly wanted to second what Robin said below.
Essentially, if anyone has a feature that barely missed the "freeze",
they should get in touch with Robin to discuss it. If something is
90-95% complete, chances are we still have enough time to get it in
(but again talk to Robin first). As Rob
Hi Mark,
I'm generally in agreement. At last weeks developers meeting it was
agreed to extend the feature freeze for 'a few days' in order to get
these features in. That was a bit vague, but that is not necessarily a
bad thing. I would be loathe to set a new deadline as that may encourage
people t
Hi Mark,
I'd like to see these fixes get into the release too.
I became overwhelmed in the past week and was unable to complete/test/commit
all the issues I had on my plate.
Peter Dietz
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Mark Diggory wrote:
> I'm noticing that there are a number of remaining
I'm noticing that there are a number of remaining issues that we would
all benefit from seeing get into DSpace 1.8. I'd like to propose that
the feature freeze be delayed another week to assure these can be
included into DSpace.
1.) add the capability to indicate a withdraw reason to an item (
to
