Re: [dspace-tech] Re: Upgrade 5.3 to 6.3 - Database upgrade error epersongroup DS-3004-slow-searching-as-admin

2019-03-06 Thread Tim Donohue
Hi David, No, no need to be concerned. "Baseline" and "OutOfOrder" are terms from Flywaydb.org (the database upgrade tool we use. "Baseline" just lets you know which was the *first* Flyway migration ever run on your database (i.e. the baseline version you started from). "OutOfOrder" just means

Re: [dspace-tech] Re: Upgrade 5.3 to 6.3 - Database upgrade error epersongroup DS-3004-slow-searching-as-admin

2019-03-06 Thread David Baker
Thanks, Tim. I've added db.schema = public to my local.cfg and that appears to have helped with the issue. Do I need to be concerned that my ./dspace database info shows these 2 lines as "Baselin" and "OutOrdr" instead of "Success" like all of the others? 1 | << Flyway Init >>

Re: [dspace-tech] Re: Upgrade 5.3 to 6.3 - Database upgrade error epersongroup DS-3004-slow-searching-as-admin

2019-03-04 Thread Tim Donohue
Hi David, No, what I was referring to is an automatic update of the local (bitstream format and metadata) registries that happens *AFTER* all the database upgrade scripts run (this update is triggered by a callback script which requires the database be updated first -- as the registry update is

Re: [dspace-tech] Re: Upgrade 5.3 to 6.3 - Database upgrade error epersongroup DS-3004-slow-searching-as-admin

2019-03-01 Thread David Baker
Below is the result of ./dspace database info. Is the ignored DS-2818 registry update what you were referring to as updating the local DSpace registries? Using DSpace installation in: C:\dspace Database Type: postgres Database URL: jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/dspace Database Schema:

Re: [dspace-tech] Re: Upgrade 5.3 to 6.3 - Database upgrade error epersongroup DS-3004-slow-searching-as-admin

2019-03-01 Thread Tim Donohue
Hi David, That's definitely unexpected. It sounds like your database upgrade succeeded, but failed to update your local DSpace registries (the Bitstream Format Registry). This syntax error is very odd, and unfortunately is nothing I've seen before: 2019-03-01 13:09:16,849 WARN

Re: [dspace-tech] Re: Upgrade 5.3 to 6.3 - Database upgrade error epersongroup DS-3004-slow-searching-as-admin

2019-03-01 Thread David Baker
Thanks, Tim. I deleted the duplicate COLLECTION_29_DEFAULT_READ group and the migration proceeded past. It now shows all of the migrations as successful except DS-2818 registry update, which I'm assuming is normal. I'm apparently having an issue somewhere else now, though. When I browse to my

Re: [dspace-tech] Re: Upgrade 5.3 to 6.3 - Database upgrade error epersongroup DS-3004-slow-searching-as-admin

2019-02-28 Thread Tim Donohue
Hi David, You are correct, this is related to the bug report in DS-2824. The problem is that you seem to have somehow created two Groups of the *same name*. In your situation, the errors is saying you have two groups named "COLLECTION_29_DEFAULT_READ". Group Names are supposed to be unique (and