Hi all,
I have news with this issue. After some tests, I decided to work with
Luke to review the content of Lucene indexes in each version (before and
after upgrade) and, surprise, the indexes are the same. I've enabled the
solr context through http and started to test different queries to
Dear all,
because of our visit statistics requirements we have moved from DSpace
statistics (DS) to Google Analytics (GA) and then to Piwik.
I will describe our main reasons in more detail below because statistics
are important for us and I think that our requirements are not that
uncommon.
On 5 June 2015 at 08:48, Bram Luyten b...@atmire.com wrote:
what are you currently lacking in DSpace stats, that make them less
trustworthy than Piwik?
Hi Bram
Piwik lets you examine logs in detail.
Give it a spin, you will see.
Cheers
hg
*Hilton Gibson*
Ubuntu Linux Systems
Hi Hilton,
what are you currently lacking in DSpace stats, that make them less
trustworthy than Piwik?
Does Piwik only rely on client-side javascript or do you also have methods
to rig it to register file downloads?
I'm a huge fan of Google Analytics (AND the DSpace stats) but my enthusiasm
On 5 June 2015 at 14:43, Mark H. Wood mw...@iupui.edu wrote:
what is preventing you doing that with the
usage data that DSpace collects?
Again, I have to advise, give Piwik a spin.
I type two-fingered - the reply is too long for me to type - sorry.
*Hilton Gibson*
Ubuntu Linux Systems
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:06:55PM +0200, Hilton Gibson wrote:
On 5 June 2015 at 14:43, Mark H. Wood mw...@iupui.edu wrote:
what is preventing you doing that with the
usage data that DSpace collects?
Again, I have to advise, give Piwik a spin.
I type two-fingered - the reply is too
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:31:18AM +0200, Hilton Gibson wrote:
On 5 June 2015 at 08:48, Bram Luyten b...@atmire.com wrote:
what are you currently lacking in DSpace stats, that make them less
trustworthy than Piwik?
Hi Bram
Piwik lets you examine logs in detail.
Give it a spin, you
Once again, please give Piwik a spin.
*Hilton Gibson*
Ubuntu Linux Systems Administrator
Stellenbosch University Library
http://staff.lib.sun.ac.za/~hgibson/docs/cv/cv.html
On 5 June 2015 at 15:44, Mark H. Wood mw...@iupui.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:06:55PM +0200, Hilton Gibson
Hi Ruben,
We also use Piwik to check.
We added the Piwikl javascript to the page structure xsl file.
We get much more detail - so we feel these are more trustworthy.
Cheers
hg
*Hilton Gibson*
Ubuntu Linux Systems Administrator
Stellenbosch University Library
Hi Tim,
I didn't do the second step, reindexing Solr Stats. Now I did it and
although the stats looks more completely (appears city and country data)
the number of visits still the same. Also it's curious in many cases the
statistics seems completely different. For example, in one community
Hi Hilton,
Yes, the first thing that we thought is the filtering of bots had been
improved and now the number of statistics has been reduced because of
this(the theory that many of old visits are from bots) , but how to
explain the big increase of visits in one of the communities?
On
Hi Ruben
Same thing happened to me:
http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/1/statistics
I can only assume that bot filtering has improved?
Cheers
hg
*Hilton Gibson*
Ubuntu Linux Systems Administrator
Stellenbosch University Library
http://staff.lib.sun.ac.za/~hgibson/docs/cv/cv.html
On 4
Hi Rubén,
Have you reindexed your Solr Stats after upgrading? See step #13 in the
Upgrading DSpace documentation:
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC5x/Upgrading+DSpace
There are two steps to actually upgrading Solr Statistics.
1) The first part it to just upgrade the indexes (to the
13 matches
Mail list logo
