Re: [Dspam-devel] address validation

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:54:29 +0100 Hugo Monteiro wrote: [...] > Aye... I've managed to get it "almost" working with TB3. > Cool. > It does already forward the messages and all, but i have a situation on > the preferences pane that i still have no idea how to solve. > Let us/me know if I can

Re: [Dspam-devel] address validation

2010-04-16 Thread Hugo Monteiro
On 04/16/2010 05:41 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:35:38 +0100 > Hugo Monteiro wrote: > > [...] > >> Is that the only issue with _ds_validate_address that you want to solve, >> or were you thinking of changing/redoing more stuff in that function? >> I'm asking because i could

Re: [Dspam-devel] address validation

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:35:38 +0100 Hugo Monteiro wrote: [...] > Is that the only issue with _ds_validate_address that you want to solve, > or were you thinking of changing/redoing more stuff in that function? > I'm asking because i could take care of that, if you'd like. > It's already fixed i

Re: [Dspam-devel] address validation

2010-04-16 Thread Hugo Monteiro
On 04/16/2010 05:02 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > >> Please correct me if i'm wrong, but appears that in client/daemon mode, >> at the moment, only email addresses are supported. >> >> > Right. At the moment only email addresses work when using client/daemon mode. > But only the GIT version has

Re: [Dspam-devel] address validation

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:45:50 +0100 Hugo Monteiro wrote: > Hello all. > Hallo Hugo, > Stevan, you might be able to answer this one. > I can try. If it is something with DSPAM then I sure can answer it :) > When using client/daemon mode, communication usually is done through > DLMTP right? >

[Dspam-devel] address validation

2010-04-16 Thread Hugo Monteiro
Hello all. Stevan, you might be able to answer this one. When using client/daemon mode, communication usually is done through DLMTP right? Happens that i was testing some stuff and i found out that if i use a non email address in the --user part, the server refuses to process the message. --