-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03-01-14 03:49, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Le jeudi 2 janvier 2014, 14:51:41 Tom Hendrikx a écrit :
>>
>> As stated in the thread with Thomas, the problem is not in way
>> patches can or could be reviewed. The manpower to do so is
>> missing, an
Le jeudi 2 janvier 2014, 14:51:41 Tom Hendrikx a écrit :
>
> As stated in the thread with Thomas, the problem is not in way patches
> can or could be reviewed. The manpower to do so is missing, and there
> are some patches out there that fix problems in code that nobody is
> (or should be) running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02-01-14 12:05, kael wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've seen in the few last emails on this list that there is no
> active development on dspam. That shouldn't be an issue if no new
> feature is planned.
>
> But as Thomas Preud'homme (debian maintainer
Hi there,
I've seen in the few last emails on this list that there is no active
development on dspam.
That shouldn't be an issue if no new feature is planned.
But as Thomas Preud'homme (debian maintainer) explained, the problem is
that bug fixes are not included upstream.
Do you know what coul
