Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM Design Problems

2009-07-20 Thread Steve
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:58:52 +0200 > Von: Andreas Schneider > An: dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > CC: "Steve" > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM Design Problems > On Monday 20 July 2009 21:37:02 Steve wrote: > &g

Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM Design Problems

2009-07-20 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Monday 20 July 2009 21:37:02 Steve wrote: > Hallo Andreas > Hi Steve, > > after 3.9.0 we should start to work on a better design of dspam. There is > > a > > big problem which should/could be avoided. > > > > If you run dspam in daemon mode and a user should be able to call dspam > > as a > >

Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM Design Problems

2009-07-20 Thread Steve
> Hi, > Hallo Andreas > after 3.9.0 we should start to work on a better design of dspam. There is > a > big problem which should/could be avoided. > > If you run dspam in daemon mode and a user should be able to call dspam as > a > client, you have to set the suid bit for dspam. So that dspam

Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM Design Problems

2009-07-20 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:21:21 +0200 Andreas Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > after 3.9.0 we should start to work on a better design of dspam. > There is a big problem which should/could be avoided. > > If you run dspam in daemon mode and a user should be able to call > dspam as a client, you have to s