In the case of M$ Outlook, the extension for an add-in was an dll, then
they could make via .NET or VB6, preffer .NET, it's more easy to run on
windows today, based on the .NET framework environment.
That are used widely over XP,2k3,2k8,vista and 7.
i had licences for .net and if i'm not wrong,
On 01/18/2010 02:40 PM, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
>>> Binaries are created using a build process. Adding a dspam binary into
>>> git also wouldn't make sense, right?:)
>>>
>>>
>> That is true for DSPAM but the Thunderbird plugin is availab
On 01/18/2010 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>> Binaries are created using a build process. Adding a dspam binary into
>> git also wouldn't make sense, right?:)
>>
> That is true for DSPAM but the Thunderbird plugin is available in binary:
> contrib/plugins/dspam-thunderbird-extension.xpi
Yeah, in
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:33:06 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:57:00 +0100
> Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:40:40 +0100
> > Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> >
> > > On 01/18/2010 12:24 PM, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> > > > Since there seems to be such interest, d
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:30:40 +0100
Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 12:57 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >> We should be careful not to add binaries though, only the source code
> >> plus instructions please ;)
> >>
> > Most Windows user will be terribly overstrained with just the source.
>
On 01/18/2010 12:59 PM, Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 12:30, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
>
>> On 01/18/2010 12:03 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>>
>>
>>> How did you get it? I wrote some while ago to the original author and never
>>> got a response. Funny that you got the source. How? Could yo
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:57:00 +0100
Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:40:40 +0100
> Alexander Prinsier wrote:
>
> > On 01/18/2010 12:24 PM, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> > > Since there seems to be such interest, do you think it would
> > > beneficial to include this code into our GIT repo
On 18/01/2010 12:30, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 12:03 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
>> How did you get it? I wrote some while ago to the original author and never
>> got a response. Funny that you got the source. How? Could you send me the
>> source?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Hi Steve,
>
>
On 01/18/2010 12:03 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> How did you get it? I wrote some while ago to the original author and never
> got a response. Funny that you got the source. How? Could you send me the
> source?
>
>
>
Hi Steve,
Mailed you off list.
R's,
Hugo Monteiro.
--
fct.unl.pt:~# cat
On 18/01/2010 12:30, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 12:57 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
>>> We should be careful not to add binaries though, only the source code
>>> plus instructions please ;)
>>>
>>>
>> Most Windows user will be terribly overstrained with just the source.
>> C
On 01/18/2010 12:57 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>> We should be careful not to add binaries though, only the source code
>> plus instructions please ;)
>>
> Most Windows user will be terribly overstrained with just the source. Correct
> me if I am wrong but the Thunderbird plugin is as well not just t
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:24:53 +
Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> On 01/17/2010 08:04 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:50:19 +
> > Paul Cockings wrote:
> >
> >
> >> As we don't have a good solution yet for spam/ham buttons inside outlook
> >> 2007, (or outlook 2003?) does anyon
Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] Outlook or Exchange retraining
On 01/17/2010 08:04 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:50:19 +
> Paul Cockings wrote:
>
>
>> As we don't have a good solution yet for spam/ham buttons inside outlook
>> 2007, (or outlook
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:40:40 +0100
Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 12:24 PM, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> > Since there seems to be such interest, do you think it would beneficial
> > to include this code into our GIT repos? (under HEAD obviously!)
>
> I think it would be very beneficial to
On 01/18/2010 11:40 AM, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 12:24 PM, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
>
>> Since there seems to be such interest, do you think it would beneficial
>> to include this code into our GIT repos? (under HEAD obviously!)
>>
> I think it would be very beneficial to inc
On 01/18/2010 12:24 PM, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> Since there seems to be such interest, do you think it would beneficial
> to include this code into our GIT repos? (under HEAD obviously!)
I think it would be very beneficial to include the code in our
repository (contrib directory). It will make it
On 01/17/2010 08:04 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:50:19 +
> Paul Cockings wrote:
>
>
>> As we don't have a good solution yet for spam/ham buttons inside outlook
>> 2007, (or outlook 2003?) does anyone have smart ideas on how we can run
>> a service/script on the exchange
Hi everyone.
Some time ago i build an application in VB6 as add-in for Outlook 2000,
maybe
i could study new versions of MSOutlook to take advantage as how they
process
and Tag the email's. but Before that we need build some daemon to receive
the
Tags from email headers then they processed by d
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:50:19 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> As we don't have a good solution yet for spam/ham buttons inside outlook
> 2007, (or outlook 2003?) does anyone have smart ideas on how we can run
> a service/script on the exchange server which will parse through each
> user looking fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
