Kurt Albershardt wrote:
What would help (aside from just plain time to implement) is a better
understanding the various architectural options and interaction with RBLs and
whitelists and tools like policyd-weight.
Hey Kurt,
Thanks for taking the time to respond. I was talking with another
On Jul 21, 2010, at 13:55 , Paul Cockings wrote:
I'd love to hear comments from anyone still running 3.6.8 and 3.8.0 I
want to understand why you didn't upgrade yet. What can we do to help you?
A bit late to the party here, but I might as well chime in:
Still running 3.6.8 on an appliance
I am running dspam from GIT/May 26 16:29 on a Production Mac OS X
machine.
3.9.0 did not work for me either.
As soon as a newer version of dspam works on Mac OS X I will submit an
update
to the MacPorts dspam Portfile so the MacPorts dspam users will also
get updated.
Regards,
Bradley
Sorry Paul. I originally sent the reply just to you.
I'm still running 3.6.8 for approximately 500 users. It works great.
I've been working on a replacement box for the last few months but it
keeps getting put on the back burner.
The new server works my only issues right now are:
1) Do I start
On Jul 21, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
Either that or grab the SPEC file and modify the paths inside the SPEC file.
I however would STRONGLY recommend to keep the RPM layout (because of future
updates).
Because of that, I'm probably going to preserve the database, groups, and
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:53:20 +0100
Paul Cockings ds...@cytringan.co.uk wrote:
Stevan Bajić wrote:
1b) Should I give access to the old system for a few months?
If you don't change the tokenizer then I would install 3.9.x and reuse the
old data. Just exchange 3.9.0 with
Stevan Bajić wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:53:20 +0100
Paul Cockings ds...@cytringan.co.uk wrote:
Stevan Bajić wrote:
1b) Should I give access to the old system for a few months?
If you don't change the tokenizer then I would install 3.9.x and reuse the
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:20:24 -0700
Mark Dadgar m...@pdc-racing.net wrote:
On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Paul Cockings wrote:
Current MySQL DB:
dspam_signature_data InnoDB 422 K rows 2.28GB
dspam_token_data InnoDB 21.52 M rows5.14GB
Now that
On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
Have you done anything special to get InnoDB to perform, other than the
typical MySQL buffer tweaking and stuff? Or is 3.9.0 just that much faster?
btw: I use InnoDB too.
I rewrote a huge part of the MySQL driver for 3.9.0. Made a lot of
