On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:21:53AM -0700, Jeff Ross wrote:
> On 11/18/10 23:01, Julien Vehent wrote:
> > On 11/18/2010 05:32 PM, Jeff Ross wrote:
> >> On 11/18/10 01:18, Julien Vehent wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I've been using SPBH and Postgresql and my setup is rather slow. It
> >>> seems th
On 11/18/10 23:01, Julien Vehent wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 05:32 PM, Jeff Ross wrote:
>> On 11/18/10 01:18, Julien Vehent wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've been using SPBH and Postgresql and my setup is rather slow. It
>>> seems that postgresql is eating most of the CPU time of the machine,
>>> even so
On 11/18/2010 05:32 PM, Jeff Ross wrote:
> On 11/18/10 01:18, Julien Vehent wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been using SPBH and Postgresql and my setup is rather slow. It
>> seems that postgresql is eating most of the CPU time of the machine,
>> even so I don't receive more than 300 messages a day on
On 11/18/10 01:18, Julien Vehent wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using SPBH and Postgresql and my setup is rather slow. It
> seems that postgresql is eating most of the CPU time of the machine,
> even so I don't receive more than 300 messages a day on that setup.
>
> I check the logs of postgres and
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:18:54AM +0100, Julien Vehent wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using SPBH and Postgresql and my setup is rather slow. It
> seems that postgresql is eating most of the CPU time of the machine,
> even so I don't receive more than 300 messages a day on that setup.
>
> I che
