Hi Ken,
If I switch from chain to osb. Should I delete all tokens and start
training from scratch?
Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:11:56PM +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
>> Hi Kenneth,
>>
>> There is no reason use OSB as a default to
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:11:56PM +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> There is no reason use OSB as a default tokenizer and some
> IgnoreHeaders in dspam.conf :)
> Should I open a case at sf.net for this ?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
The only reason I have not pressed to make this change is
Hi Kenneth,
There is no reason use OSB as a default tokenizer and some
IgnoreHeaders in dspam.conf :)
Should I open a case at sf.net for this ?
Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 03:52:22PM +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I s
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 03:52:22PM +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that people suggest using OSB tokenizer and adding IgnoreHeader
> to avoid useless tokens.
> If OSB is better, why do dspam package use chain tokenizer in default
> dspam.conf? and has a few ignoreHeaders to dspam.con
