Re: [Dspam-user] Some tokenizer statistics

2011-05-05 Thread Stevan Bajić
I know, I know have resent the message with correct formatting. On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:02:16 -0400, Julien Vehent wrote: > HTML MESSAGES ARE EVIL ! > > use plain text please ! > > (and no I'm not using mutt, that html bloab below was displayed on > roundcube) > > On Thu, 05 May 2011

Re: [Dspam-user] Some tokenizer statistics

2011-05-05 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Thu, 05 May 2011 14:14:30 +0200, Ed van der Salm wrote: > Since I'm not behind the machine (it's at home) for now only the info > I > know. > Okay. > I installed a virtual machine which i restored after each run. > 'each run' = after 5 batches + the final run OR 'each run' = after swi

Re: [Dspam-user] Some tokenizer statistics

2011-05-05 Thread Julien Vehent
HTML MESSAGES ARE EVIL ! use plain text please ! (and no I'm not using mutt, that html bloab below was displayed on roundcube) On Thu, 05 May 2011 14:43:30 +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On Thu, 05 May 2011 14:14:30 +0200, Ed van der Salm wrote: > Since I'm not behind the > machine > (it'

Re: [Dspam-user] Some tokenizer statistics

2011-05-05 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Thu, 05 May 2011 14:14:30 +0200, Ed van der Salm wrote: Since I'm not behind the machine (it's at home) for now only the info I know. Okay.   I installed a virtual machine which i restored after each run. 'each run' = after 5 batches + the final run OR 'each run' = after switching to

Re: [Dspam-user] Some tokenizer statistics

2011-05-05 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Thu, 05 May 2011 10:22:12 +0200, Ed van der Salm wrote: > Hi all, > > (Maybe a monospaced font makes it more readable) > There seems to be some questions about the tokenizer to use (for me > to), > so I thought it would be nice to have some statistics. > > First about the setup I've chosen: >