On 25/06/10 17:27, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
I'm to new with dspam to offer suggestions but I can state this
assumption is wrong.
Hi Bradley,
You are very welcome to come join in the discussion. The project is
always looking for new members. If you're a coder then be sure to
So I changed the tokenizer to osb, but left the trainingmode at TEFT.
Re-ran a big spam corpus and some ham and things started working better.
I think the main problem was my confusion over the X-DSPAM-Probability
header. It appears that X-DSPAM-Probability is either 0.0 (not spam)
or
Just wanted to check in again. Every incoming email gets
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.
I'm not a statistician, but this can't be right. I've trained Dspam
(3.9.0) on hundredes of spam / not spam from the SA publiccorpus and a
spam-free folder. Every time I get a spam message I retrain the
